Talk:Gangnam Style/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ElectroPro (talk · contribs) 23:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Over the next few days, I will give a thorough review of the article,"Gangnam Style",which had-and still- gives me some happiness.Greg Heffley 23:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oh wow, I'm actually done
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
This is a great piece of work, but not perfect
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- The UN statement in the rest of the world section needs a reference.
- Already referenced to this. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Correct reference is actually here, but thanks for pointing it out I've added the correct ref to the article -A1candidate (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Already referenced to this. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- The UN statement in the rest of the world section needs a reference.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- the parodies section doesn't seem so focused, in my opinion.
- I believe it to be focused, and that it states the major aspects of them. The parodies section is still linked in with Gangnam Style, and should be included. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- the parodies section doesn't seem so focused, in my opinion.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- not biased
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- no recent edit wars.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- all images are perfectly tagged
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Besides the parodies thing, this article seems GA-ready. i just need a second opinion for the focus
- Pass/Fail:
Greg Heffley 00:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC) P.S., feel free to question my decisions.