Talk:Ganglia (software)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Perl, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PerlWikipedia:WikiProject PerlTemplate:WikiProject PerlPerl articles

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Seems like the description of Ganglia was taken word for word from the Ganglia website (http://ganglia.info/). May need to be changed. -- Faraazs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faraazs (talk • contribs) 17:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The description is still straight from Ganglia's website; added POV-check-section template since, as might be expected, the tone appears to be lacking NPOV. -- Raidicul (talk) 21:30, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the release to 3.3.1 and checked the links. There was an old link to an IBM paper of 2006 which discussed an out of date interface and 3.0 internals. I have removed it! I note the comments above about this being Ganglia's description, and while I feel it should be redone I do not think a neutrality banner helps the reader. Other than that of robustness there are no claims about its performance that consistute a POV. In particular there are no claims of it being superior to other software. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

removing stale tags

Removing notability tag because:

ganglia is in both the ubuntu and centos repos
ganglia is an integral part of the Rocks Cluster Distribution and rocks doesn't have a notability tag
ganglia is an integral part of other cluster distros as well, and so is much larger than rocks

I'll leave the refimprove tag for now, as the article only has one reference. --ssd (talk) 12:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]