Jump to content

Talk:Gangaajal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reviews

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gangaajal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'll be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Add WP:ALT text to the image in the infobox.
  • "and background score" → "and a background score"
  • "he inspect the area" → "he inspects the area"
  • "after heated argument" → "after a heated argument"
  • "conection" and "Nunwas" – typos
  • "seek for his help" → "seek his help"
  • "by a shooting him" → "by shooting him"
  • "on an emergency leave" → "on emergency leave"
  • "on police he had saved" – reword
  • "as it new for her" → "as it was new for her"
  • "co-operative" → "cooperative"
  • "Flming ended" → "Filming ended"
  • "a protest held by" → "a protest was held by"
  • "highest-grossing Indian film" → "highest-grossing Indian films"
  • "mixed reviewed" → "mixed reviews"
  • References are archived.
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed