Talk:Gang bang pornography

Notability concern?

Valrith, I'm not sure what you're concerned about. The films won multiple AVN Awards for best selling porn movies of their year, there's been an international documentary, and lots of non-trivial attention by unrelated sources, all described in the text, from AVN to AIN, to Salon magazine, to Howard Stern. That clearly meets Wikipedia:Notability - what am I missing? --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 17:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

• Well, I have to agree there's been more than a little coverage of it. I still don't see that as establishing notability... Valrith 18:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • The note you added says: "The best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject." That's been done. What am I missing? --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 19:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
    • It's a template - I didn't write it. I still don't think this subject is notable, but I can't marshal significant arguments to that effect at this time. I've removed the tag... Valrith 05:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Thank you! --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 05:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Worlds biggest gangbang2.jpg

Image:Worlds biggest gangbang2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gang bang pornography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100316151650/http://www.redhottv.co.uk:80/gbgb to http://www.redhottv.co.uk/gbgb

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gang bang pornography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091027140431/http://www.erotictradeonly.com:80/news/article/?id=331 to http://www.erotictradeonly.com/news/article/?id=331

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know. Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Sources

"We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources". Even the higher-quality sources within the article make clear how dubious the purported "world records" are. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

• There were plenty of reliable sources in this article here, including citations from trade magazines from this industry (AVN, XBIZ & ETO) and CultureKiosque. The recent attempt to gut (removing around 85% of the article's content) this article also violated the results of two previous AfDs, which resulted in the redirection of those articles to (now) removed article content. Guy1890 (talk) 05:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gang bang pornography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091011064309/http://archive.salon.com/health/sex/urge/1999/08/31/houston/ to http://archive.salon.com/health/sex/urge/1999/08/31/houston

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)