Talk:Gambler's fallacy/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: LauraHale (talk · contribs) 08:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
This article was correctly assessed as a start. Huge tracts of it are not cited. The sources violate WP:MEDRS. The nominator made only four edits to the article, which did NOT address the GA criteria and violated WP:MEDRS. See this edit. It is clear the nominator was not familiar with or concerned with criteria at time of nomination and subsequently has not been interested because no work towards those criteria. Demonstrated they are not interested in meeting criteria but meeting criteria. See Template:Did you know nominations/Gambler's fallacy where they failed to respond to issues. Suggest no one will bother to bring it up to GAN and I can't see this being done in a week. --LauraHale (talk) 08:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)