Talk:Galapagos shark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I have gone through the article and made a few minor copy editing changes. I disambiguated a wikilink, hopefully correctly. In my opinion, this is a fine article and clearly meets the GA criteria. —Mattisse (Talk) 14:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are various and reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Addresses the major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on subject of article

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 14:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)