Talk:Galac-Tac
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Galac-Tac appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Publisher change
[edit]I get the sense from the wording between the 1984 Paper Mayhem article and the 1990 and 1992 Paper Mayhem articles that the publishing team may have remained the same and they might have just changed the name. However it is not clear, so I didn't state that outright in the wording. --Airborne84 (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Galac-tac, a play-by-web game today, first began 39 years ago in 1982 as a play-by-mail game? Chris Milliken (March–April 1990). "A Review of Galac-Tac". Paper Mayhem. No. 41. p. 18; Daniel A. Dias (May–June 1984). "Featured Review: Galac-Tac". Paper Mayhem. No. 6. p. 3; White, Genny (March 2014). "Galac-Tac Encounters of the PBM Kind: Galac-tac Returns" (PDF). Suspense & Decision. No. 5. Suspense-and-Decision.net. p. 3.
- ALT1: ... that Galac-tac, launched in 1982 as a play-by-mail game, is still available today for play on the web? Chris Milliken (March–April 1990). "A Review of Galac-Tac". Paper Mayhem. No. 41. p. 18; Daniel A. Dias (May–June 1984). "Featured Review: Galac-Tac". Paper Mayhem. No. 6. p. 3; White, Genny (March 2014). "Galac-Tac Encounters of the PBM Kind: Galac-tac Returns" (PDF). Suspense & Decision. No. 5. Suspense-and-Decision.net. p. 3.
- Reviewed: Review pending
Created by Airborne84 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:51, 16 November 2021 (UTC).
- The article is new enough and long enough. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. While everything else checks out, a QPQ is needed. SL93 (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you SL93. I've done a review on the Borocera cajani nomination for QPQ. Appreciate the review! Airborne84 (talk) 02:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- This is ready. The promoter can choose the hook. SL93 (talk) 16:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you SL93. I've done a review on the Borocera cajani nomination for QPQ. Appreciate the review! Airborne84 (talk) 02:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)