This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
A fact from Gainsboro Branch Library appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Review pending - Also, I made two small edits to this article back in October, but didn't begin expansion until a week ago. My understanding is that it's still "new", but correct me if I'm wrong.
@Geardona: Thanks for the review. To be clear, this is my seventh DYK nom so does require a QPQ, which is forthcoming. If you're interested in a second opinion on your review, you want to use the 'subst:DYK?again' template prior to approval. I'm honestly not sure if that can be done once the review is in the Approved queue or not, though. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 15:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DrOrinScrivello: We shall see, if you get the QPQ done before it is placed into the actual queue by a helper, it shouldn't be a problem, as for the second opinion, it was just indicating that if I did something wrong, correct me. Geardona (talk to me?) 18:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think many in the United States of a certain age may be able to guess why segregated, but those elsewhere and even younger readers will not (and they really should not have to guess anyway). In particular, were blacks excluded from other libraries by law (Jim Crow law), city policy, or by social custom? Alanscottwalker (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alanscottwalker: Thank you for the feedback, and I agree with you that it would be helpful to have this information included in the article. While I'm relatively sure it was a Jim Crow law on the books in the city that mandated separate facilities, I haven't yet been able to find a reliable source that says so. I will continue searching and will update the article if and when I find this information. Thanks again. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]