Talk:GXO Logistics

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 January 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This page was proposed for deletion by MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk · contribs) on 23 December 2022.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... XPO Logistics split into two companies today (August 2, 2021), and the new company is called GXO Logistics. It's a real company with real employees, real trading on the NYSE, real customers, etc., so I don't think this article should be deleted for the simple fact that this article will, inevitably, exist one day. I disclosed my potential for COI before creating the page to be transparent. I work for XPO, but I'm not paid to make Wikipedia edits — I just work there. My other reason for not deleting the page is none of the content is new. It's all migrated from existing content on the XPO Logistics page. Gannymetis (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC) --Gannymetis (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion, Dec 2022

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past with the comment:
promotional language
It was contested by [[User:Gannymetis|Gannymetis]] ([[User talk:Gannymetis|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/Gannymetis|contribs]]) with the comment:
Removed promotional language; It's obvious both that the article needs to be improved and that it needs to exist. Will edit later.

Gannymetis (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello ResonantDistortion. I would like to further discuss one of the removed tags please. The phrase "...the most comprehensive shared space offering in the country" seems to be a significant claim, therefore I think that it should be supported by a third-party source rather than a quote from the company. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I would agree if it was stated as a verified fact - however the article text is currently very clear that it is the company itself making the claim. While a reliable secondary source is always preferable, the current source is adequate for the text. ResonantDis_tortion 16:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. I beg to differ; the claim is quite significant regardless of whether a qualifier is used for it. Therefore it seems that WP:SOURCES requires secondary sourcing here. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]