Talk:GUCH

Medicine: Cardiology / Society Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

There is a proposal to merge this article into congenital heart defect. No reason is given. GUCH people is a distinct group with distinct problems. A merger is just as meaningless as to have all congenital diagnosises in one article. --Ekko 14:21, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree: GUCH relates to a subset of people with congenital heart defects and is also specifically the name of the UK's patient support group. MissLayton 19:59, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GUCH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pregnancy

doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000458 JFW | T@lk 09:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]