Talk:GSX2

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Clinical significance

There was a section on the significance of this protein and gene in this article, but the source (De Mori et al.) is WP:PRIMARY and I feel further research is needed to justify any claims of the particular disorders or symptoms that may be associated. Recon rabbit 15:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for reviewing the article. I found a link at the NCBI's ClinVar about the SNP: [1] - that's a secondary source and it's listed as "pathogenic" there - they have a strict review process before actually labelling something that. Is it okay to add back in with the secondary source? Molecular Pilot 21:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, I'm more comfortable with that knowing the research has been interpreted beyond the initial peer review. The database appears somewhat easier to interpret by a typical reader, and the original citation is accessible from there as well. Recon rabbit 23:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]