Talk:GRTensorII

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Fulsome? Yes. Addspam? No

I (the creator) am a genuine fan, and in any case GRTensorII is freeware, not a commercial product (you need a commercial product to run it, namely Maple, but when development of GRTensor began, I believe Maple was still free or at least inexpensive). GRTensorII is an integral part of WikiProject GTR. Also, I am not Eric Poisson, but he is a well known researcher in this field and he does recommend it. Kayll Lake has also made a significant contribution to the study of static spherical symmetric perfect fluid solutions. Feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any doubts this stub is genuine.---CH (talk) 06:56, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's you I'll give it the benefit of doubt. But son, you're walkin' the line. DV8 2XL 00:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I should have said, please check out Category:Exact solutions in general relativity. I am trying to make it easier for students to learn how to compute with gtr (or not have raised the issue at all). DV8 2XL, did you notice that GRTensorII is educational freeware? If you use Maple, I urge you to download it and check it. Compare with other tools such as Maple's built-in tensor manipulation routines. I think you'll agree that GRTensorII is much easier to use!---CH 02:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Students beware

I created the original version of this article and had been monitoring it, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.

Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive. I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.

Good luck in your search for information, regardless!---CH 23:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]