Talk:GRIN2B

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Biophysics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biophysics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BiophysicsWikipedia:WikiProject BiophysicsTemplate:WikiProject BiophysicsBiophysics articles

Linked to dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy?

Saw no direct mention in the reference given; Pubmed search also was not successfull. --CopperKettle (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Were under discussion here. Should shift discussion of these specific edits here. I am copying my own initial comments there, here.

diff -- series of edits explicitly about human health sourced to primary sources PMID 26194112 and PMID 25656819 and PMID 25356899 and PMID 10485705 (an 18 year old primary source) and PMID 19838302 and PMID 25225386 and a Nature News piece and a NAS report and a Science News piece (PMID 28209849). The content suggests gene editing to cure autism (editing the genes discussed in the content based on primary sources). This is dangerous and irresponsible editing and I have reverted it. 22:20, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

After some discussion, the initial edit was lightly edited and restored. That edit still contained content about human health sourced to primary sources as well as WP:CRYSTALBALL content about gene editing for human enhancement. I removed both restored bits in this diff and this diff. I left some of the content sourced to primary sources that was only about animal studies. This is suboptimal but I won't remove that again.Jytdog (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jytdog: As the article stands now, there is no reason to mention the FOXP2. Perhaps you don't understand the topic. DennisPietras (talk) 02:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I missed that bit of WP:SYN (yet more policy-violation). removed it. Jytdog (talk) 02:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]