Talk:GNU Scientific Library

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weird sentence

C++ programmers have to use static functions redirecting to the correct member function, since the address used for static member functions in C++ is compatible with the GSL.

to someone unfamiliar with this subject, this sentence is confusing. i always thought incompatibility produced problems, not compatibility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.223.153 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 21 February 2007

Is that relevant? That feature is not important and a member function pointer can be easily transformed to a functor. --Chricho ∀ (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even see how this belongs in this article. Function pointer / member function pointers difference is a pure C++ aspect and while it might be a problem when C libraries from C++, this is in no way specific to the GNU Scientific Library ...--139.124.3.100 (talk) 12:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GNU Scientific Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041013202445/http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/pointers-to-members.html to http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/pointers-to-members.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]