Talk:GGV Capital

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GGV Capital article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

It is requested that an image or photograph of GGV Capital be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Private Equity

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This project seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:

Private EquityWikipedia:WikiProject Private EquityTemplate:WikiProject Private EquityPrivate Equity

nominated for deletion

Non-notable company; existing citations do not meet WP:RS, and there appears to be no significant news coverage that could be used to help this company meet WP:N. Flowanda | Talk 09:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to object that the Reuters ref prevented speedy deletion but then I looked at it and realised it was just a press release. I now agree that speedy is appropriate. --DanielRigal (talk) 10:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly not a speedy delete, and I have removed the tag. The company is notable on the basis of its size and historical portfolio of companies which includes public companies and other notable articles on Wikipedia and the article certainly asserts notability which precludes a speedy deletion. The article itself is factual and neutral and although the referencing is not inline, the notability is at least established based on the several notable third-party sources in this area. If you want to improve the stub, I would encourage that and have suggested some areas above but do not see your push to eliminate the article as productive as this is one of the larger venture capital firms, with more than $1 billion under management. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 21:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sources you provided are trivial mentions or press releases. AltAssets is little more than a marketing/advertising vehicle that you've used to create almost all your articles. I've nominated the article for deletion. Flowanda | Talk 04:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]