Jump to content

Talk:GForge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Updated

[edit]

The old INRIAGForge (https://gforge.inria.fr/) is now powered by FusionForge (at the same URL). I deleted this line from the Installations sections. Weakpedia (talk) 08:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled discussion

[edit]

I just looked at the site and noticed that it contained just 2 projects... Is it really necessary to have an article about it? Or does this have other reasons? --Stefan Kögl 19:14, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The point of GForge is not to be a hosting alternative to SourceForge, but as a 'hosting platform' alternative to the now-closed source Sourceforge codebase. --LodeRunner 19:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well GForge the software is pretty useful, even if GForge the website is only hosting itself. It might also be useful as support to SourceForge and GNU Savannah pages which would red-link it otherwise. And we have pages for plenty of less-capable pieces of software.

I didn't notice that when I created the page actually, so I probably put undue emphasis on the website, thinking that it was hosting the same sorts of things as Savannah. Ojw 20:15, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Perdue did a closed rewrite, same as VA?

[edit]

If the page is going to continue having a snarky comment about VA closing SourceForge (and doing a rewrite in Java), it would be appropriate to also mention that Mr. Purdue (who leaves the comment about VA closing their source on the gforge.org project page) is selling his own closed rewrite...

—Hobart 21:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The page no longer has a "snarky comment" that I can see, and the closedness of GForge AS is mentioned. 151.203.203.100 05:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to update this page to add in the fact The GForge Group (http://gforgegroup.com) offer GForge Advanced Server which is related to this article. I understand that since I own the company this could be received as a marketing/advertising type ploy so I'm looking for advice on how to best edit this in. In particular, the current article says GForge is now FusionForge which is technically partially correct. However, Tim Perdue (who passed away in Sept. of 2011), did close the source and start our company. Admittedly, while a huge consumer of Wikipedia content I have never contributed and realize this is an open, organic effort. My only goal is to make sure the article includes the fact Tim did in fact found The GForge Group which, like FusionForge, is a fork of the open source GForge code now offered commercially. We can then look to add a separate entry about our company (which has it's own challenges being we are biased). Please advise... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gforgegroup (talk • contribs) 21:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, you guys fork SourceForge due to it becoming closed source and name it GForge, which you later close down too under name GForge AS and only FusionForge is true libre SourceForge. Every time I hear about "OpenSource" - every time - proprietary source comes out as result. Hypocrisy much? 77.180.112.65 (talk) 09:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Installations: closed or open?

[edit]

Added a sort-of disclaimer to the installations section. Just checked LuaForge, and all they do is link back to gforge.org, but nothing indicated whether it is the old GForge SW or GForge AS (I tend to think it's the old, as I suspect GForge AS to also look different, but I cannot be certain). --jae (talk) 12:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GForge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GForge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GForge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:GForge&oldid=1207410069"