Talk:GEDitCOM

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Apple Inc.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why

why is this under your personal page and not in the main wiki? 211.28.209.102 (22 May 2010)

Unfortunately I believe this to be a single purpose account and involves a conflict of interest by the person who created the article. See here Geditcom on twitter the messages say its from Kevin Gartner (Location Corvallis, Oregon, USA) and on linkedin, [1] and [2], [3]. That aside, I use Geditcom myself and think it a great program by the way, not sure how to add it to the main wiki? 114.76.95.250 (talk) 23:48, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done moved article to main space and reworked article to be npov gioto (talk) 06:03, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing maintenance templates.

This article is no longer written like an advertisement, and the discussion above under "Why" indicates that this was addressed in 2010. I propose removing that maintenance template.

The second maintenance template speaks to a more serious issue with the article: Notability. The article cites the software's own website and release notes extensively. There are two external sources: a forum with 43 posts and a cursory review of the software. It seems unlikely that this article meets wikipedia's notability standard. MaitiuStiofan (talk) 04:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]