Talk:G0y/Archive 1

Archive 1

Google vs. GoogleNews

While a general Google search may reveal a lot of hits, Google News search of places that actually qualify as Reliable sources gives a great big 0 returns. -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

One opinion piece in a student newspaper is not likely to stand up to a notability reivew. I hope you find more. -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Dude, it's not a pissing contest. chill. :-) (still going thru google) -- User0529 (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Nonsense

The article reads, 'The g0y movement rejects anal sex as disrespectful and degrading toward the bottom male's masculinity, and denounces it in favor of oral sex and other non-penetrative expressions of sexuality.' This is nonsense. Oral sex is penetrative. Skoojal (talk) 00:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Whether oral is penetrative depends on definition. (re: non-penetrative sex). depends on how you define "penetrate" (sticking your wang in an open mouth isnt' exacting "penetrating" it in the strictest sense either) If there are no more 3rd party sources in 24h i won't contest a revert back to the article's former redirect status. -- User0529 (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Unless oral sex is unambiguously not penetrative, the article can't say that it is not penetrative. The article about non-penetrative sex doesn't even seem to know what it is saying, the first sentence is, 'Non-penetrative sex (also known as outercourse and dry sex) is sexual activity without vaginal, anal, and possibly oral penetration, as opposed to intercourse.' How on earth could 'oral penetration' possibly be 'non-penetrative sex'? Skoojal (talk) 00:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

words are fingers pointing to the moon, words are not the moon. (i dont really give a fuck, that is a debate for the editors at the non-penetrative sex article) :-) -- User0529 (talk) 00:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you don't really give an F, I'm going to change the article. Skoojal (talk) 03:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Except that you've redirected it now, so I can't. Skoojal (talk) 03:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

What do you call yourself if you're wussy about self-describing as bisexual --sorry, I mean, if you're g0y-- and Jewish? Nuttyskin (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

self-revert

self-reverted page to former life as a redirect. --User0529 (talk) 00:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Unless someone wants to just delete the article namespace alltogether, I am changing the redirect to Non-penetrative sex. The g0ys are not about being straight-acting, they are about embracing masculinity & promoting non-penetrative forms of sex. (note to skooj, Non-penetrative sex article includes oral sex, whether it belongs there or not is not my battle to fight. i would have previously felt like you that since it involved taking the penis within part of the body it would be "penetrative" but i can see both sides to it. that is a debate for that article's talk page though, and i don't really want to fight it out over arbitrary words which mean different things to different people. --User0529 (talk) 13:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)