Talk:Geji

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geji article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

China: History

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Proposal

This discussion has become a train wreck. No editor coming to this talk page stands a chance of comprehending the rambling, disjointed meanderings.

The article is also a mess and hasn't been improved by recent changes. Much of the content is either unreferenced, poorly referenced, fails verification or referenced to obscure offline sources that cannot be verified. There is also a question of WP:POV and WP:OR.

I think WP:ATD-E is appropriate here, that is reducing the article to a stub, the remaining content being fully verified by reliable sources. John B123 (talk) 19:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I agree that WP:ATD-E is probably a good course of action. The size of the article and the scope of the errors makes it incredibly tedious to try and fix at this stage. Brocade River Poems (She/They) 21:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support:

At this point, the talk page discussion isn’t going anywhere. Correcting the text would be far more complicated than simply reducing the article to a stub. Someguywhosbored (talk) 03:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Judging from the extensive discussions above, if some future editor decides the article needs expansion, I think a stub as John B123 proposes would be a far more useful starting point. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Geji&oldid=1247758929

Hello, I am the new editor. I have tried my best to fix this article. Please you review and supervise the changes. I hope the version will not be deleted because the readability is better than before. 103.170.73.25 (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Geji&oldid=1247819797 103.170.73.25 (talk) 06:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts but the underlying problems with the article still remain, and it has increased in size with your edits. --John B123 (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from this discussion, it appears that we have consensus for the stub change correct? Someguywhosbored (talk) 07:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think so! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the only oppositon has been indeffed for abusing multiple accounts, I think it's clear to go forward, yeah. Brocade River Poems (She/They) 17:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. John B123 (talk) 19:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have reduced it to a stub. I am not sure if I did it right, however. I've tried to keep the contents brief but well sourced. Brocade River Poems (She/They) 21:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well done, that looks good to me. I've made a couple of layout changes to try and stop the image/infobox hanging so far below the bottom of the text. --John B123 (talk) 22:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I had no idea how to fix that myself, unfortunately. Brocade River Poems (She/They) 22:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]