Talk:Fullmetal Alchemist/GA1
GA Review for Fullmetal Alchemist
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
1. Well written:
[edit]Pass this section with conditions - While the article is well written, some of the language used may be a little confusing for people coming to the subject for the first time. I refer for example to the use of the word "homunculi". The terms "manga" and "anime" have not been internally linked. Many people confuse these terms, muddling one for the other. I am passing this section purely on the condition that a little simplification and a couple of extra internal links are added soon.
2. Factually accurate and verifiable:
[edit]Pass this section - This is a complete pass. Plenty of references, all external links live and accurate, well covered. Work is fully accurate and has no issues at this time.
3. Broad in its coverage:
[edit]Pass this section - This article is extremely broad, covering all aspects of the story, differences between the manga and the anime versions, different parts of the work, books, dvd, etc. About as broad as it could be.
4. Neutral:
[edit]Pass this section - Article is wholly neutral. No issues.
5. Stable:
[edit]Pass this section - Stability has been achieved per Sephiroth's post to me. I see no other reason to hold this article back from GA Status.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
[edit]Pass this section - All images correctly licensed and covered by appropriate Fair Usage rationales.
Notes from reviewer
[edit]
This article has no issues preventing its GA status being achieved. This article therefore PASSES GA from 29th November 2008. I would like to congratulate all editors involved in its creation and bringing it to GA Status.
Reviewer: Thor Malmjursson (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)