Talk:Fuji Xerox Towers

A fact from Fuji Xerox Towers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 7,100 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Fuji Xerox Towers (pictured), a skyscraper in Singapore, was given the 2005 Energy Smart Label Award by the Energy Sustainability Unit and the National Environment Agency?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/February.

Wikipedia

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Skyscrapers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some proposed changes

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Information to be added: Fuji Xerox Towers offers views of the sea and city from its office units. The building is strategically located as it is a 5-minute walk from Tanjong Pagar MRT station, and is accessible to 3 expressways - East Coast Parkway (ECP), Ayer Rajah Expressway (AYE) and Central Expressway (CTE). References supporting change: http://cdlcommercial.com.sg/property/fuji-xerox-towers Yang Alexandra (talk) 03:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, this is something you'd expect to see in a marketing pamphlet rather than an encyclopedic article. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can the information be rephrased in such a way that it does not seem promotional? Yang Alexandra (talk)