Talk:Fudai daimyō
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fudai vs. Fudai daimyo?
[edit]This article links to the ja wiki's article for "fudai daimyo." However, this article's title is still fudai. The fact that the ja wiki splits it into two articles-- fudai and fudai daimyo respectively-- bears some consideration. Are there any opinions on this? -Tadakuni (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- The English article covers the topic of fudai daimyo. I'd favor renaming it that. And renaming Tozama to match. Fg2 (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Can I go ahead and move/rename? I've got the sources on hand right now to do so and expand/cite the new articles well. -Tadakuni (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- I won't protest Fg2 (talk) 00:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- C-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- High-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles