Talk:Friends and Lovers
(Redirected from Talk:Friends & Lovers)
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 30 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Friends & Lovers to Friends and Lovers. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 30 March 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Friends & Lovers → Friends and Lovers
- Friends & Lovers (album) → Friends & Lovers (Marsha Ambrosius album)
- Friends and Lovers (album) → Friends and Lovers (Bernard Butler album)
– There is no particular reason to go against WP:& on this page. There are more uses of the spelled out conjunction than those with an ampersand. For the albums, it was already determined by Come & Get It and Safe & Sound that the ampersand is not enough to qualify for WP:SMALLDETAILS. (CC) Tbhotch™ 16:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. — BarrelProof (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and BarrelProof. The form "and" is indeed more common than "&". As for the two albums, the difference does need to be more distinct between the duplicate parenthetical qualifiers "(album)" and "(album)". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom and discussion. Good find. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.