Talk:Friedrich Nietzsche's views on women
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Friedrich Nietzsche's views on women was split to Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche on December 7 2009. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Humor
[edit]Something should be said of the humor involved in Nietzsche's remarks on women. They are the funniest passages in his writing and can be seen as simply poking fun of women, a deliberately subversive and mischievous activity. Nietzsche could have done the same for men, but probably didn't simply because he himself was a man and therefore could not have had the same sharp tongue.
article has been classified as terrible-class — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.25.91 (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Positive remarks in his writings
[edit]Shouldn't they also be included?
T 83.109.183.59 (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Problematic citation of The Will to Power
[edit]The Will to Power is a book not published by Nietzsche. It must be mentioned that it was published after his death by his sister. Writing philosophical books is always writing what you think, and in the end only a small part may make it into a final work. Actually, the citation has never been approved by Nietzsche, and while his life experience with some women lead him to write such things, he probably would have never published it (only due to the stupidness of his sister it was published at all). --178.197.227.134 (talk) 13:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Done. --178.197.227.134 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Women as source of all folly and unreason (former sub-entry)
[edit]Leonard Lawlor and Zeynep Direk points out that: "What Nietzsche says — and repeats with hysterical insistence — is that woman is the source of all folly and unreason, the siren figure who lures the male philosopher out of his appointed truth-seeking path."[1]
=> now, this is problematic, among other reasons, insofar as Nietzsche often has a generally sentimentalist outlook himself.
Biohistorian15 (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Leonard Lawlor and Zeynep Direk, Derrida, Routledge, 2002, p139
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Continental philosophy articles
- Low-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Modern philosophy articles
- Low-importance Modern philosophy articles
- Modern philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles