Talk:Fried chicken/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to take on this. Posting my comments in a few days. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly well-written, only a few comments:

General

Two dablinks need to be fixed [1]
- Done one, as far as I can tell there are no links to "Southern fried chicken" from this page. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 12:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh, that one is listed as a dablink at the top, no issues. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 12:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Say either "African American" or "African-American" throughout the article.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 12:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Per WP:MOSLEAD, the lead should be three good paras long covering all the major aspects of the article.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Will give a thorough read once done.~~
The lead reads much better now, but the variants and racial stereotypes should also be mentioned, add a few lines.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History

The section appears a bit choppy, please combine paras.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We generally don't wikilink continents
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Would be good to add when the middle ages were.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
in the 18th and 19th century, in the United States Is the comma needed?
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think "lard" should be wikilinked
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Source for the 3rd para?
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
among both blacks and whites Should we call them so even when we talk of the present day?
- Done removed this bit. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The economic/caloric necessity...today's fried chicken. Still appears unsourced.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 08:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see a bit of overciting at the end of the fourth para.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can this section be illustrated to make it more interesting? Perhaps with an image of lard?
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Description

Can this section be expanded? Are there no other sources that can describe its composition and impact on health?
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Convert templates for 40 grams, 12 grams
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Source for last line of 2nd para?
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
is filled with fat I think "consists mainly of fat" sounds more proper here.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
monosodium glutamate (or MSG), which is a dangerous acid Can you include something on its effects on health?
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
in any of the methods described above I think you refer to the methods in the next section. Should the last para then belong to "Preparation"?
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Preparation

The section appears a bit choppy, please combine paras.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Paras 1, 2, 4 and 5 are unsourced.
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not quite. See the paras, they do not end with the proper inline citations. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The batter can/may contain "can" should be enough
- Done Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Chicken Maryland mentioned separately? It is just like any other variety.
- Done moved into the global variants section. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rest looks good. No copyvio detected. Images are in order. The above addressed, I would be happy to promote this. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 11:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I'll try to clean this up and hopefully I'll get back to you in a few days. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sainsf: I've finished fixing everything you brought up here. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have added a few more comments. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sainsf, I've hopefully resolved these issues now. Let me know if there's anything still withstanding that needs to be fixed. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 11:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! This can be promoted now. Great job! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 11:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thank you, Sainsf for such a thorough review. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]