Talk:French ironclad Thétis/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Blah blah footnote, you know the drill :)
- I think that you must have started this right before I added the footnote to all these ships.
- Does this need the note about why it took more than two years to build the ironclad, a la the other French ironclad articles?
- I don't think so, 2-3 years is normal. 5+ is exceptionally long and needs to be explained.
- You need to mention the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871 in the Service section, as an explanation for their blockade.
- Done already
- Blah blah footnote, you know the drill :)
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Did the Thetis do anything proactive to support French citizens during the Carlist War?
- Nothing is specified. I just know that she was present.
- Can it be clarified if it was an accident (presumably) when she rammed the other French ship?
- Done already.
- Any idea why she wasn't sent as the Flagship of the Pacific Squadron?
- No idea, just that she was replaced by Montcalm.
- How did she lose her propeller?
- Not specified, although I'd dearly like to know myself.
- Forbes and Rockwell in citations, not in references
- Do you want me to move them down into refs and convert them into short cites?
- What she was named after is mentioned in the lede, but not the main body of the article
- Done and cited.
- Did the Thetis do anything proactive to support French citizens during the Carlist War?
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Interesting article, needs a few details and then it can be passed. Skinny87 (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hah, looks like I'm outpacing your efforts to add those notes, for which I apologize! I'm going to pass this now, but if you could move those refs to what is proposed (short system) that would be great. Skinny87 (talk) 16:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)