Talk:French destroyer Le Hardi

French destroyer Le Hardi has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 13, 2019. (Reviewed version).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French destroyer Le Hardi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 07:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this one. Zawed (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the lead: "July Attack on Mers-el-Kébir": suggest rephrasing to "July attack on Mers-el-Kébir". I can't see this mentioned in the body?
Perhaps add commissioning date to infobox
"Le Hardi was built by A C de la Loire": recite the shipbuilders' name in full for consistency with infobox?
"550-millimeter (21.7 in) torpedo tubes,"; should the dimensions of the tubes be presented in the same style as for the guns? i.e. millmeter vs mm?
Image tags check out OK
External link OK
No dabs, no dupe links

Will check back in a few days. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All done. Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine, passing as a good article, I consider this meets the GA criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed