Talk:French destroyer Kersaint (1931)

French destroyer Kersaint (1931) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 2, 2019. (Reviewed version).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French destroyer Kersaint (1931)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 22:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On my list. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is the range or the shell weight of the main armament known?
- Sure, but I save those sorts of details for the class article which gets all the technical details.
"although these were older models than the one previously installed" Either "older models" → 'an older model'; or "one" → 'ones'.
"lest the ships be turned over" "lest"? You've been reading my articles. Optional, suggest 'to prevent the ships being ... '
- Is that a terribly old-fashioned term? I like it because it's economical, and, you know, every additional keystroke is something to be avoided if I'm to maintain my current level of output. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well up to your usual standards. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed