Talk:French cruiser Châteaurenault (1898)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
[edit]3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
6. Illustrations ✓ Pass
Comments
[edit]1.
- Length is given as 140 m in the infobox, and as 135 m in the prose
- Fixed
- Beam is given as 17 m in the prose and as 18 m in the infobox
- Fixed
- Draft is given as 7.39 m in the prose and 7.5 in the infobox
- Fixed
- Displacement is 7898 in the prose and 8200 in the infobox
- Fixed
- Complement is 604 in the prose and 625 in the infobox
- Fixed
- Isn't it standard to have the range in the infobox?
- Yup, good catch
- " cast iron, AP, and SAP projectiles" - I can tell what AP and SAP stand for, but the acronyms should be introduced instead of just brought it
- Huh, I could've sworn I did that when I wrote that section - must have gotten distracted
- Isn't armor plating typically in the infobox for these ships, too?
- Yes indeed - added
- Prose says keel laying in May 1896, infobox says 12 October 1895*
- Fixed
2.
- The exact commissioning date of 10 October 1902 is not cited, only the month and year are.
- Fixed
- Namesake is not cited
- Removed
- Shouldn't Garbett go before Gardiner in the ordering of the references?
- Yep
- The succeeded by class needs cited
- I don't think there's an expectation that nav templates need sources
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
- The short description of "ship" is a bit lacking, something like "French protected cruiser" would be better.
- Added that
The infobox needs quite a bit of work. Hog Farm Bacon 04:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I forgot to overhaul the box when I finished writing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 00:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Passing. Hog Farm Bacon 02:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)