Talk:French battlecruiser proposals/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 23:49, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Lead
[edit]- No issues
Background
[edit]- No issues
Gille's design
[edit]- Fix disambiguation issue with "freeboard" as noted by this
Durand-Viel's designs
[edit]- No issues
Notes
[edit]- No issues
References
[edit]- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that it meets the good article criteria. There was one disambiguation issue that I could find, but I went ahead and fixed it for you. Keep up the good work you are doing! Rp0211 (talk2me) 00:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)