Talk:French Second Republic

France High‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history High‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Regarding the cartoon, shield raising was an ancient Celto-Germanic Kinging ceremony. I doubt it is, or is exclusively, Roman. Shield raising may date to the time of Vercingetorix.

Awful — from Britian

The EB copying is blatantly obvious here. Some of the text uses extremely poor language, EG. "Were they to remain faithful to their original principles, as Lamartine wished, and accept the decision of the country as supreme, or were they, as the revolutionaries under Ledru-Rollin claimed, to declare the republic of Paris superior to the universal suffrage of an insufficiently educated people?". 68.39.174.238 01:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed name change

To Second French Republic (I am proposing this change for all French Republic articles.)

Second French Republic is a more precise translation of Deuxième République Française. The name of the regime was the French Republic, and it was the second one. Funnyhat 06:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's keep the discussion unfragmented, since we will either make all these name changes or none of them. Could everyone please respond on Talk:French Fourth Republic? Phaunt 22:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy in dates & events

"General Charles Oudinot's entry into Rome provoked in Paris a foolish insurrection in favour of the Roman Republic, that of the Château d'Eau, which was crushed on June 13, 1849."

Discrepancy in the above as the entry into Rome by the troops of General Oudinot took place on 30 June 1849. Consequently, the 13 June Château d'Eau insurrection could not have been provoked by an event that took place seventeen days later. Frania W. (talk) 16:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The date for the Constituent Assembly election contradicts the Wikipedia page for the election itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dahuey37 (talk • contribs) 07:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Context needed

As it stands, the History section makes little sense.

Why was the population of the faubourgs on its way to central Paris? Why were there barricades? Who was manning them? What were the protestors protesting about?

I guess the whole section has been copied from somewhere (EB?) without context. Maproom (talk) 23:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)I do not mean this as negative, but the style of the article feels as if it is translated from French. Often French discussions of subject assume a basic knowledge of the subject by the reader. These discussions fill in the details. However, this may not be appropriate for this article, especially for foreigners who may not have much background in French history.[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:French First Republic which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:French Third Republic which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Map?

I was under the impression that a portion of contemporary Algeria was administered as a part of France itself during the Second French Republic. Is this not true? A quick perusal of the Google results seems to tell me it was the case -- am I missing something here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackwc123 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency - move to Second French Republic

CLOSED

Duplicate discussion; moved to Talk:French Fifth Republic; please comment there.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

So, the English Wikipedia has articles entitled First and Second French Empire. Number, then nationality - which is proper according to the rules of adjectival order in English.

This is not a matter of empires vs. republics, as we also have articles on the First and Second Spanish Republics.

Yet we persist with this inaccurate and inconsistent "nationality, then number" rule for the French Republics. I'm going to assume that a non-native English speaker made the innocent mistake of writing "French First Republic" in the beginning ... but do not understand why we insist on perpetuating this mistake.

But then, we spent two decades displaying the wrong flag of Austria-Hungary, so I guess we're a stubborn bunch? 2600:1702:6D0:5160:D9B3:92CC:9790:303E (talk) 20:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

English abstract of this email

Vidio 41.123.65.113 (talk) 13:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]