Talk:Freestream (Cars)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Freestream (Cars) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Automobiles

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles

Business

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Merge with Caparo T1

I vote for merging this with the T1 article. Though this car began life under the Freestream name, the car had barely been announced Business Week (February 7 2006) when Caparo took over Automotive World (March 15 2006). More info at Racecar (March 18 2006) So the Freestream article is never going to be more than a very short stub. Assuming things develop as planned, then a seperate article on Caparo Vehicle Technologies will be needed at some time soon but at this stage of the game I think the car and company history should be considered one and the same. Mighty Antar 22:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I vote against a merger. This has to do with a company, not the vehicle itself. I propose, however, that this article be renamed, or merged, with the Caparo Vehicle Technologies article. —Mr Grim Reaper (talk • contribs • email), 21:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since there are other companies called Freestream, and main use of the word is as an aeronautical engineering term, I renamed the page Freestream_(Cars).Paulgush (talk) 20:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only an Aeronautical Engineering term?

Wrong. It really is a Flow of fluids term. Anyway, the article on freestream is too short, incomplete and narrow that it is almost useless. Amclaussen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.20 (talk) 19:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]