Talk:Freeport Doctrine

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Douglas & 1860 Election

Time for a few comments -- MrG 4.228.21.74 18:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James MacPherson's BATTLE CRY OF FREEDOM strongly attacks the idea that Douglas lost the election of 1860 because he came out in favor of popular sovereignty. MacPherson points out that he had pretty much lost his chances when he came out against the bogus Lecompton Constitution of Kansas in early 1858. MrG 4.228.21.74 18:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some older views — that Lincoln craftily "trapped" Douglas into making a statement at Freeport which directly and solely lost him the support of southern Democrats — were certainly melodramatic and oversimplified. However, the Freeport Doctrine, in the form of the demand for the insertion of a congressional slave code plank in the Democratic platform, was the immediate cause of the split at Charleston in 1860... AnonMoos (talk) 07:38, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The idea that Popular Sovereignty was any kind of "compromise" between pro-slavery and anti-slavery positions was of course vehemently rejected by anti-slavery advocates, since in practice Pop.Sov. required those opposed to slavery to give up previously-won protections and gains (such as the Missouri compromise line), while receiving absolutely nothing in return -- and furthermore, the events following the Kansas-Nebraska act seemed to set off a flood of ever-increasing and ever more extreme Southern demands... AnonMoos (talk) 07:38, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]