Talk:Freelancing in India

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Freelancing in India article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is a selected article on the India portal, which means that it was selected as a high quality India-related article.
	This article was last assessed in March 2019.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Encyclopedic tone / NPOV

Despite some significant improvements in the past, large parts of the article still read more like a personal essay of an author with a strong bias in favor of freelancing. Some entire paragraphs (including the lead) are not really presenting their content from an uninvolved perspective. Also, informal phrases and metaphors, which are common in online news, should not be used in an encyclopedic article. The description should focus first and foremost on dry basic facts, instead of offering a largely uncritical eulogy for all the benefits and wonders of freelancing. GermanJoe (talk) 14:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference structure?

Some references in the article were placed behind totally unrelated content, some do not include the referenced statements and statistics (maybe something got mixed up during a previous reorganization). I have fixed and tagged a few cases, but all references and their usage should be double-checked, if anyone with more time wants to give it a shot. GermanJoe (talk) 15:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: During the cleanup of the initial article version several of the original references seem to have been misplaced within the article (the original version did not include proper inline-references). GermanJoe (talk) 10:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Outsourcing in India" - removed

I have removed this section wholesale, for a number of reasons:

Almost none of the content was sourced by the accompanying references (as mentioned above, the referencing in this article is a mess).
Most of the sources were not adequate for such a topic (Q&A posts, blogs, etc.), and some of the facts were unsourced and possibly WP:OR.
"Outsourcing" is not "freelancing". While the topics are somewhat connected, they are not synonymous. The section failed to describe this topical connection in a meaningful way (and based on reliable sources). Content solely focussing on outsourcing in India would be better added to Outsourcing#By country. GermanJoe (talk) 10:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]