Talk:Free Speech Coalition

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Free Speech Coalition article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Freedom of speech Mid‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is biased!

The first paragraph of the main text ends with very partial language: "They are powerful lobbyists who wish to keep pimping and the exploitation of women legal in the United States." Someone else should rewrite this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.51.24.110 (talk) 23:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Needs citations

I'm not sure the 'Original Research' template is the right one, but the whole article is in desperate need of citations. It reads very much like it was written by someone close to the subject matter. The last paragraph in particular is more like the conclusion of an opinion article than an encyclopedic one. -Zegota (talk) 02:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just changed the template to COI, which I think is more appropriate. I don't know much about the FSC, so I don't know how much I can help, but there are a lot of problems with this article, starting about a month ago. -Zashitnik (talk) 10:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research

The vast majority of the prose lacks sources and therefore constitutes original research. Unless citations from WP:RS sources are offered content will be deleted. - Semitransgenic _talk. 16:21, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, it just means that that whoever added the content did not support it. You claiming that its made up is an entirely different circumstance. Have you actually checked any of it? -Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) 03:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Performer Availability Screening Services (PASS) be merged into Free Speech Coalition. The content in the PASS article (such as it is; it's a stub) can be better explained in the context of the FSC. I was going to develop the PASS article, but there is little to develop it with so unless/until it becomes WP:N on its own, I think this is the best place for it. Lightbreather (talk) 18:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Free Speech Coalition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100109100140/http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/pressreleasesmedia/135-award.html to http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/pressreleasesmedia/135-award.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/industry/news/stars.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/archives/199909/bone/by0999_24.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/archives/200010/bone/by1000_06.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/bone/by0901_06.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/bone/by0902_02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]