Talk:Britney Spears conservatorship case

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Britney Spears High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Britney Spears, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Britney Spears on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Britney SpearsWikipedia:WikiProject Britney SpearsTemplate:WikiProject Britney SpearsBritney Spears
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Louisiana / Mississippi Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing

Should we be using low-quality sources such as BuzzFeed, RadarOnline, The Blast, TMZ, and Us Weekly for a topic that's this contentious? KyleJoan^talk 04:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. We should be using high-quality sources, as that is the standard on Wikipedia. Shoestringnomad (talk) 20:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, the sources should come from credible and reliable authority. The news sources cited (e.g., BuzzFeed, Us Weekly, etc.) may not be credible, though they are current.Idelmund (talk) 23:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Merged. Popcornfud (talk) 13:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Formal request has been received to merge Free Britney movement into Britney Spears conservatorship dispute; dated: December 3, 2021. Proposer's rationale: The former article can be merged into the latter's ##FreeBritney section. Pinging proposer @Theknine2: note that the two articles are 180k and 38k in size, so WP:LENGTH and WP:SIZERULE may be factors to consider here. Discuss here. Richard3120 (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Obviously related topics and it never made sense to me that they were separated in the first place. Regarding length, I think both articles could benefit from some serious trimming in any case. Popcornfud (talk) 19:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, as per my submitted request. The prose size of the resulting article is certainly a cause for concern, but a lot of the content in "Free Britney movement" is already contained in the "Britney Spears conservatorship dispute" article, and hence when merged correctly, the prose size of the latter article should be well within the guidelines stated in WP:SIZERULE. Theknine2 (talk) 14:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, per previous messages. The topics are extremely similar, and I too have wondered for a while why they were ever separate to begin with. benǝʇᴉɯ 21:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, per above. — AFreshStart (talk) 13:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, given the extremely similar nature of both topics. The only thing I'm curious about is what will the final merged article's name be? Thanks. shanghai.^{talk to me} 19:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the existing article title, Britney Spears conservatorship dispute, covers all the topics sufficiently. The Free Britney movement was part of the dispute. Popcornfud (talk) 15:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Religious dynamic

This article doesn't really go into the religious dynamic, but the conservatorship has been seen in terms of conservative religous assumptions that a father should control his daughter's life. There's an interesting take on it here. --Doric Loon (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see at all how that has any relevance. 71.129.228.139 (talk) 21:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]