Talk:Frederick Webb Hodge

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

questionable questionableness

This kind of commentary needs to be shown & discussed in the Talk Pages, rather than poxed throughout the article by someone who can't be bothered to research their objections, e.g.: clarify | yes.famous expedition. Supposedly he couldn't have been more than four years into his "job" whatever that was for the Bureau of Ethnology, which credential doesn't show up here|date=August 2013. Manytexts (talk) 08:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AGF. I came here through an Acoma-type article. Interested, I started checking various facts. As I pursued them throughout the article, it seemed to me that his credentials were vastly inflated. The items popped out one at a time as I was researching him. I didn't enter the article with any intent of downgrading anyone, or any editors effort. It's just that the citations and credentials don't stand up, one at a time. It appears that he was linked with barely famous anthropologists expeditions and happened to be in the right place at the right time, to be included on them. With no statement of and credentials to do so, except a possible lack of credentials or accomplishments in his previous work. Article probably should be deleted. I was "sort of" hoping that someone who had edited this stuff in would pop a rabbit out of a hat and I could avoid the nomination. Student7 (talk) 16:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]