Jump to content

Talk:Frank Lapidus/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Intial review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A reasonably comprehensive review of the fictional character "Frank Lapidus".

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    So called references 2 to 10 are links to wikipedia articles.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    So called references 2 to 10 are links to wikipedia articles.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

The use of wikipedia articles are not acceptable as "reliable sources". These references will need to be replaced with WP:RS. Pyrotec (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 to 10 are referencing episodes of the series. –thedemonhog talkedits 01:02, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that contribution. On that basis I will accept them. Pyrotec (talk) 08:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]