This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I'm a huge Francis E. Dec fan, and his widespread popularity on the Intarwebs makes his article encyclopaedically relevant. But Frank Gulotta? Okay, it's fine to mention him on Francis E. Dec's
page, but if that is the *only* notable thing about him he does not deserve an encyclopedic entry. I'm sure there are many, many district attorneys who are more notable, but we don't have articles for all of them because it's trivial. Same here. This article has no need whatsoever to exist and should be deleted/merged with Francis E. Dec. I'll try to figure out how to officially nominate it. GngstrMNKY (talk) 18:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
O.K., I concede that the article is linked to by ONE other article: the son, Thomas Gulotta. But, if everybody even remotely important has their entire lineage on wikipedia, every random article you tried would be a bio stub. I still say delete it. A few sentences added to the Dec article will more than suffice. GngstrMNKY (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
