This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Don't cut and paste this article into Francisco de Aguirre (conquistador). Instead, wait for an admin to move it there in the proper fashion, wherein the edit history, talk page, etc. will also be moved. It's up on requested moves [1] now. After it's moved, we can re-establish the disambig page later. Erudy18:57, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved the page, and restored the disambiguation page at Francisco de Aguirre. If one of the two Franciscos de Aguirre is clearly the primary topic, then it would be appropriate to move that page to Francisco de Aguirre and take care of disambiguation with some kind of {{dablink}}. For now, it'll be fine with neither topic as a clear primary. -GTBacchus(talk)07:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
