This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Wikipedia is not a collection of quotes, especially ones designed to push a particular POV. There is no evidence that quote is significant enough to be included in a biography of Francie, so I've removed it. Articles about living people should never be used as battlegrounds to push a POV, so unless there is consensus for inclusion it should not be added back. 2 lines of K30313:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That quote is probably what Molloy is most notable for. The only POV expressed by the quote is Molloy's. The article was stable including the quote, there was no consensus to remove it, and I have restored it pending further discussion and consensus. Irvine22 (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are being highly disingenuous. The article was stable for months before you added that quote, which was added by you to push a POV. The stable version, as I said in my edit summary, is the older version without disputed information. Please stop edit warring. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive'04:10, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Um, no. He's notable for being an MLA. When disputed additions are made to articles about living people, the stable version is the one before the addition. Consensus works that way with articles about living people. As such I don't need consensus to remove it, especially when your so-called "consensus" lasted four days. If you want to include it, show why this quote is significant that it needs to be included. No assertions, no opinions, show me sources. 2 lines of K30313:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see you're now adding BLP violating commentary to the quote to try and shoehorn it into this article now. I recommend you desist, before you lose your ability to edit. 2 lines of K30314:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
