Talk:Francesco Zirano/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nemoschool (talk · contribs) 07:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Failed good article nomination on November 13, 2019

Upon its review on November 13, 2019, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:

contains cleanup banners including, but not limited to, {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}}, etc, or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar inline tags

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. So sorry for the bummer... I’d fix it all myself if I could, but the “life” section really needs some major cleanup. The content is well-written and reliably sourced, I tagged and quick-failed it solely because of the structure. While you’re at it, getting an image of the subject wouldn’t hurt. (There must be an icon of him from the Catholic Church somewhere.) Do that and resubmit it, I’m sure you’ll have a fighting chance!

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. —Nemoschool (talk) 07:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have any strong disagreement with your suggestion that the "Life" section be divided into subsections, but you quick-failing a GA nomination that has been sitting in the queue, waiting for a reviewer for 8 months, based upon the presence of a cleanup tag that you yourself added to the article an hour before is a major bummer. That's not how a GA review is supposed to happen. Having a section in an article that is too long is not a quick-fail criteria. I will resubmit this article again to the GAN queue and hopefully will receive a fresh set of eyes on it. RecycledPixels (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]