Jump to content

Talk:Frances Tiafoe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Frances Tiafoe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 14:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

[edit]
[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

Career

[edit]

Playing Style

[edit]

Coaches

[edit]

Personal life

[edit]

Notes & References

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
Placed on hold. Not too much to do, just the above. A few issues with neutral point of view, but otherwise seems like a great article. I've also done an archive of your sources, to stop WP:LINKROT. I'll keep this open for you to respond to for around a week. Thanks for reading. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Out of curiosity, how did you do the archiving? Is it manual or automated? Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-automated. You have to set the bot to run (although, it does run automatically across Wikipedia, I believe). https://tools.wmflabs.org/iabot/index.php?page=runbotsingle is the location. You just have to type in the article name, then click " Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)". Alternatively, you can locate to History (on the article that you want to archive) and under external tools: "fix dead links". That will take you to the location of the url above, and even put in the article name for you. Whilst it's hardly something to stop a potential GA nom, it's something I believe all GAs should have done, as it does help to archive. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, Lee Vilenski! I addressed everything above. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take a look through now! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

8 year old coach

[edit]

Wow! 98.115.35.76 (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "first Sierra Leonean American man to be ranked in the top 10 by the ATP" comes off as humorously specific to me

[edit]

Sierra Leonean Americans make up 0.01% of the US population and only a handful of Americans have ever been ranked in the top 10 by the ATP. Of course he's the first one. This might as well say "he's the first person with the last name Tiafoe to be ranked in the ATP top 10." Like... obviously? Sportscenter kind of stat. Somarain (talk) 18:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is pretty ridiculous. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]