This article was nominated for deletion on 19 October 2007. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
She's a published writer, with hyper-linked sources. Whether you like it or not, I think that makes her 'notable' within Wikipedia's definition, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellouise (talk • contribs) 00:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that Frances Osborne merited her own entry hence I created the article, but the entry has been edited to read like a publisher's publicity puff. If you're going to quote from good reviews, you could equally quote from bad ones. I don't think she's an important enough writer to merit this level of debate. Surely best to keep to the facts for the time being.
Hellouise22:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated this article for deletion because it was unsourced. During the discussion, another editor provided the reviews as evidence that the subject is notable. I added the sources and withdrew my nomination for deletion. If you have reviews expressing other points, feel free to add them to the article. Otherwise, if the article remains unsourced, I might renominated it for deletion as original research. --Evb-wiki22:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But surely the reviews can still be included as references at the bottom of the page without having clearly partial adjectives like "brio" in the main article? It just seems very unbalanced and more like an advertisement than an encyclopaedia entry.
Hellouise23:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you get the factual details of her personal life? That/those would probably be the proper source(s) to cite in support of her notability. --Evb-wiki23:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
