Talk:François Coignet/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Add alt text to every image being used.

•  Done

• Add a comma after "Labrouste’s report".

•  Done

• Remove the comma after "little value".

•  Done

• Remove the comma after "world patrimony".

•  Done

• Add a comma after "the exhibit".

•  Done

• Replace the WP:ALLCAPS in citation #3.

•  Done

• Several references are missing dates/authors/websites/access-dates.

•  Done

• Answers.com is not a reliable source.

•  Done

• Archive sources.

•  Done

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• @Some Dude From North Carolina: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)