Talk:Fossickers Way

Australia: New South Wales / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Fossickers Way is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Australian Roads: New South Wales Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	New South Wales

This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.

This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, purge this page, or add |needs-kml=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.

Nundle

Since when has Nundle been on the New England Highway? The infobox shows the southern terminus being at Tamworth. Does Fossickers Way actually extend further south to Nundle? Bleakcomb (talk) 21:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do u think about the edit I have made to the entry about Fossickers Way?

Please comment about the changes I have made to the Fossickers Way entry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Missmelissad (talk • contribs) 04:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's quite a bit of repetition, you haven't taken account of what others have written. And it hasn't been properly referenced with in text citations. But the information is good. Marj (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fossickers Way. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100520044712/http://www.fossickersway.com:80/index.cfm?page_parent_id=22&page_id=22 to http://www.fossickersway.com/index.cfm?page_parent_id=22&page_id=22

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]