Jump to content

Talk:Fospropofol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2008

[edit]

i am concerned that the general tone of this page is too commercial and too pro fospropofol in the absence of either data or clinical experience. the text assserts 'advantages' etc which are non evidenced Robert Sneyd —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.163.84.17 (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


As of today's federal register this is a newly proposed US DEA Schedule IV drug. The comment period ends August 24, 2009. The legal status should be updated then.66.166.38.18 (talk) 15:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retractions

[edit]

Given the dangers and the investigators' retraction of much of the original source data, I've hidden the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics sections. It needs careful reexamination and source review before reintroduction. LeadSongDog come howl! 20:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wer die Flöhe husten hört, sollte sich langsam nach einem Psychiater umsehen!;D — Preceding unsigned comment added by FK1954 (talkcontribs) 20:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]