Jump to content

Talk:Fort Leavenworth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Information Box Format

[edit]

I changed the format of the information box from the previous format to one that has already been established for military installations http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Fort_Leavenworth&diff=222857417&oldid=221952683 The reasoning behind this, Fort Leavenworth is an active U.S. Army installation. The other U.S. Army installations Fort Campbell, Kentucky, Fort Drum, New York, Fort Hood, Texas, Fort Riley, Kansas, Fort Myer, Virginia, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, etc. have the same format and even this installation is a historical post, it is no exception to the rule already established on Wikipedia. -Signaleer (talk) 13:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The old infobox was spectacularly misleading. I don't believe the whole fort is on NHS. Thanks again. Americasroof (talk) 19:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are other historical installations like West Point, New York, Fort Monroe, Virginia, Fort Myer, Virginia, Fort Sheridan, Illinois, etc. which are historical installations but the precedence has already been established for the information box format. -Signaleer (talk) 16:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manning Detention

[edit]

Didn't want to go ahead and add this but it's been confirmed that this location is where Private Manning will serve up to 35-year prison sentence, as reported in The Kansas City Star Given the media attention this case had garnered it would seem fitting to mention this point on the wiki.

Bull1701 (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fort Leavenworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Leavenworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Leavenworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fort_Leavenworth&oldid=1207273224"