Jump to content

Talk:Forrestal-class aircraft carrier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


No Sources

[edit]

This article does not quote its' sources, nor does it appear to be consistently worded in a neutral tone, nor is is consistent with other wikipedia articles (the article on the Midway class states it could hold 100 planes realistically, where this article says it would only hold 50 planes (possibly to make this carrier sound better?). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.154.10.177 (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Size

[edit]

There have been several comparisions with the Midway class, one of which listed the Forrestals at twice the displacement. They were twice the displacement of the Essexes, but only 25% -33% or so larger than the Midways at equivalent load conditions. Kablammo 13:13, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Higher Requirements

[edit]

This article states: "which had higher requirements that piston-engined airplanes had" Sufficiently vague to be meaningless - in what way "higher"? higher gross weight? larger footprint? greater landing/takeoff speed? more fuel? taller aircrew? what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.140 (talk) 17:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Her Metals

[edit]

This article states: "her metals sent to the scrapyard" This must be UK English 'cause no one over here would say anything like this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.140 (talk) 17:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

www.battle-fleet.com/pw/his/Forrestal_USS_CVA59.htm

[edit]

This serbian website is an mirror of wikipedia articles and us only this info: Text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, but without link or info to wikipedia. --80.128.34.32 20:38, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. Structure could be improved --dashiellx (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hull swap

[edit]

there are a bunch of ol' saratoga salts having a discussion on: is the hull of the sara originally the hull of the forrestal. seems to be a valid question since the ships were built within five months of each other. i for one, disagree with the hull change. 72.218.240.197 (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)][reply]

Not really a forum, but it would seem unlikely since Forrestal was built in Newport News, VA and Saratoga was built at the New York Naval Shipyard. From the newspaper archive, the keel laid in Virginia was being called Forrestal on the date it was laid. Same with Saratoga, keel laid as Saratoga, in Brooklyn. There are some articles in 1950 with the sec-def expressing opposition to naming a proposed super-carrier after Forrestal on the grounds that carriers were not normally named after persons. (except one named for FDR) However, by 1951 most of the articles refer to the lead ship as Forrestal or James V. Forrestal. --Dual Freq (talk) 01:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forrestal-class aircraft carrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forrestal-class aircraft carrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forrestal-class aircraft carrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Forrestal-class_aircraft_carrier&oldid=1202093294"