Talk:Forever and Ever (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Forever and Ever (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Film: Chinese

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (290)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,046)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,463) • Stub-Class articles (6,712)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,342)

Untitled

Since when a film has to be "major" and "successful" to be considered encyclopedia worthy?

Promotional

Promational puffery by a major contributor who stars the remake??? What are you talking about??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim12chang (talk • contribs) at 09:47, 21 October 2008

That would be you, Mr. Chang.

As for standards, yes, there are some, since Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a directory. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 13:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am THAT Tim Chang?? Ha ha ha!!! That is the funniest thing I've ever heard!! Well, thank you very much. Such a compliment! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim12chang (talk • contribs) 20:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given that he's a failed and apparently marginally talented actor, I'm not sure why you'd be flattered by the comparison. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong DVD cover image

The DVD cover image belongs to an unrelated 1968 movie which has the same English name but a different Chinese name (zh:金石情). I had removed the image from the article. --Joshua ^{Say "hi" to me!}_{What I've done?} 10:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]